Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37599
The construction of the automatic tourbillon calibers 93 and 94 are . . .
. . . entirely covered from the movement side, which makes the decision to retain a dial-side cutout that enables a view of the tourbillon completely understandable. Almost every watch employing a tourbillon that I know of exposes the mechanism for the benefit of viewing pleasure; the only notable exception I can think of is Patek Philippe. While it must be a difficult decision to make at a marketing and managerial level, my sense is that a Meißen dial describing the tourbillon in hand-painted script combined with the shrouded cal 94 would produce a more telling effect than exposure of the mechanism. An aura of mystery is at least as compelling as disclosure, and perhaps to some a more powerful attraction . . . cordially, Art
Quite right, Nicolas . . .
By: Dr No : June 2nd, 2009-09:35
. . . the magnificence of the Reverso Skeleton has pushed the Nº 2 back into the recesses of my memory ;-). Here's a photo of the Meißen tourbillon without the questionable benefit of my wrist for your viewing pleasure . . . . . . cordially, Art...
True, Graham, but they . . .
By: Dr No : June 5th, 2009-10:53
. . . were limited production models; the movements were made in the late '40s for chronometer trials, and cased in '80s when the tourbillon revival was in it's infancy. I've seen one at close range during Omegamania, and it - along with the similar Patek...