donizetti
2655
correct
but if what I say is true and angular momentum is the important quantity, then you can calculate the moment of intertia of the two wheel sizes and the angular velocity corresponding to the frequency, multiply (which gives you angular momentum) and compare, the bigger value would be the "more stable" watch. Stricty speaking we are talking about vectorial quantities, and also we impose a forced osciallation through the spring, but to a first approximation it might be useful.
Best
Andreas
my guess is that
By: donizetti : August 1st, 2011-11:15
assuming that the balance wheels are poised equally well, a bigger and more rapidly beating wheel (as well as one that is more massive) should have the higher angular momentum, a conserved quantity, and should therefore be less easily disturbed, and thus ...
Bigger is never faster
By: aaronm : August 1st, 2011-11:30
The size of a balance wheel is a tradeoff between size, which gives you stability, and speed, which allows errors to be corrected more rapidly and have less effect on timekeeping. Neither is "better" or "worse" they are different approaches that attack th...
correct
By: donizetti : August 1st, 2011-11:32
but if what I say is true and angular momentum is the important quantity, then you can calculate the moment of intertia of the two wheel sizes and the angular velocity corresponding to the frequency, multiply (which gives you angular momentum) and compare...
from what I have read...
By: aditya : August 12th, 2011-20:00
.... (smaller balance wheel+ higher beat rate) = (less easily disturbed + more sensitive to improper service/ lubrication) & the other way round. So, I suppose, movement design is all about compromises Also, I would assume it would take a lot of power...