WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Instrument first, but not exclusively.

 

As another poster put it so well, the instrument is about "doing" while the watch is about "having." You owe it to yourself to meet that need first.

You are lucky that you play the piano. After you spend a bit over $100K, no additional expenditure will get you a better instrument. I play the 'cello, and there is no effective ceiling. (I suppose there is, but it's high enough in the millions to be irrelevant to me.) I didn't get involved in watches until (a) I had highly satisfactory instruments and (b) I was fairly sure that I would not be able to afford to take the next step up.

I will now argue against myself in one respect: there may be times in your life when you are not playing much: a new baby, job travel, hand problems, or even just lack of inclination. At those times, your "have" items will still be rewarding to you even when your "do" item is not. Therefore it's good to have a source of aesthetic pleasure you can enjoy without having to put time into it. Nevertheless, if I didn't have a good instrument, I would be looking to "make do" with interesting but inexpensive watches until I had acquired the instrument.

  login to reply