WatchProSite|Market|Digest

WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

It is, not from Rolex but from Tudor!

login to reply

Some will love if those will be released in Basel 2019

By: Jocke - Bad Santa : January 21st, 2019-14:05

and some will not. The ghost. THE LV. ...

Without forgetting this one...

By: amanico : January 21st, 2019-14:15

...

Just do it !

By: Walter2 : January 21st, 2019-16:39

The Explorer one dial is 1 mm bigger than the Sub without date. This 14060. ...

The Subexplorer. That would be cool! [nt]

By: amanico : January 21st, 2019-23:45

It is, not from Rolex but from Tudor!

By: Walter2 : January 22nd, 2019-05:30

...

I could like that very much. [nt]

By: Jay (Eire) : January 21st, 2019-18:36

We’ll love it Jocke, if Rolex releases them

By: JohnFM : January 21st, 2019-19:24

If not, they remain Frankenbeauties ... Subplorers?

Franken, i dont know ? From my 14060 with Explorer dial all parts are 100% original Rolex. And they have done this 60 years ago and do this with Tudor now.

By: Walter2 : January 22nd, 2019-05:40

...

Looks great Walter

By: JohnFM : January 22nd, 2019-09:26

I put a Daytona crystal on a 16610 and love it.

I agree that, i dont like the cyclope lense. My Datejust ist also without.

By: Walter2 : January 22nd, 2019-14:31

...

A new SmoothMariner maybe :-))

By: Tony.A. : January 21st, 2019-23:10

...

My kind of design. This one for me, Sir! [nt]

By: massi. : January 22nd, 2019-05:36

What no blue dial or ltd edition 'Salmon' dial? [nt]

By: redcorals : January 22nd, 2019-05:22

The bezel would have to be in ceramic [nt]

By: COUNT DE MONET : January 23rd, 2019-06:14