expwmbat
467
No--I just wanted a comparative ranking of those
But they are all similar: haute horology, manufacture movements, about 100m WR, no diving bezel, cross-over better than dive watches (i.e. can be worn appropriately in dressier situations).
I don't think Rolex compares: 1) because it's a dive watch, 2) movement has different design motivations/principles, 3) finishing falls well short of the others.
But I can see that no one wishes to offer their opinions of how this list shapes up--that's okay, as I'm really enjoying the Chopard, and was primarily just curious about what Purists thought about how it compares to the direct competition.
DJK
Sportwatch battle--rank'em!
By: expwmbat : January 8th, 2009-06:57
Greetings Purists, I recently acquired a Chopard LUC Sport 2000, and am extremely impressed with all aspects of the watch--movement, casework, dial, hands, amazing markers, beautiful finishing, outstanding bracelet. At any rate, having this fine watch mak...
???
By: JediWatchFool : January 9th, 2009-10:56
Wombat, I think you're treading on pretty thin ground there. The Submariner, and indeed any of the Rolex professional series are in my opinion, and I'm sure not mine only, some of the finest sports watches ever made in terms of sheer versatility and durab...