Bounce781
4731
Thanks, Edward. Very frustrating situation.
Yes, currently trying to work this situation out.
The company is stone-walling but I am sure the situation is as described (i.e. in 2013, watch was investigated by the manufacturer, swiss police and AD. The watch was returned to the buyer with the approval of the company and the AD, but now the watch company is kicking up trouble.
I can't explain it, but am annoyed that 1 was the 2nd owner in the chain after the original discovery and now they want ME to wear the cost of being stuck with this watch.
Very frustrating.
Thanks Henrik but
By: Bounce781 : November 13th, 2016-20:23
to my knowledge there has not been any other claims on the watch. The watch manufacturer and the Swiss police have investigated this in 2013, and had enough grounds to release the watch to the new owner (in 2013). What I don't understand is why NOW, the s...
Thanks, Padj
By: Bounce781 : November 13th, 2016-20:25
There is no claim from the insurance company. I have no explanation why the same watch company doesn't acknowledge their own decision from 2013. All the are saying is: "The watch was stolen, and we will not service it". But they investigated this in 2013 ...
Can confirm...
By: alittle : November 14th, 2016-04:15
Contents of the emails have been corroborated with the parties involved, who have a direct relationship with the maker in question. The matter is extremely frustrating, and any attempts to reason have been shot down with little to no explanation. (I`m the...
Thanks PJ S
By: Bounce781 : November 13th, 2016-20:28
The insurer is not involved. My understanding is that all this was sorted back in 2013. If now, the watch company is saying that they made the wrong call, I believe that I (as a later owner of the watch) should be compensated since the watch company allow...
Hi rick
By: Bounce781 : November 17th, 2016-03:14
I don\'t have official police reports. The case was handled 2 owners ago (not me, not the guy I bought the watch from m, but the guy HE bought it from - if you know what I mean). My frustration is that the original evidence was presented to the watch comp...