amanico[JLC Moderator]
401417
Very nicely written article, Marcus.
Ref 5153 for me...
Not suire about the 5270... Will have to see it in the flesh, because the 2 subdials ( small seconfs and minute chrono ) are not centered anymore, bunt under the 3 / 9 o'clock, and the two holes at each side of the moonphase are disturbing me a bit, aesthetically speaking.
Mechanically, nothing to say.
With PP, first comments are difficult to express, a bit of time and in the real experiences are necessary before any final comments.
Thanks for this very interesting post, Marcus.
Best,
Nicolas.
A few comments
By: ling5hk : April 28th, 2011-16:14
In general, Patek has shown some effort in this year novelties. But 5496 is a disappointment. The date 15 and 17 are again "cut" by the leap year window. You can also see that in Ref 5059 and Ref 5159. My favourite is the Aquanaut Travel Time. I see more ...
wow
By: thehorologist : April 29th, 2011-08:35
Amazing post great article. I was at the bazel show too and was amazed by the Patek booth. I must have gone up and down that spiral showcase 4 or 5 times! All of the watches I only could look at in the magazines were all in a 9ft radius! What else is ther...