halgedahl
1333
Yes… I asked that for you, but it didn't get answered, per se. More than likely any savings in energy would be slight enough to be disregarded in favor of fewer parts?
But I'll keep a tally of unanswered questions and "re-submit." I'm sure that he is sincere in his wish to answer all of our questions.
From the horse's mouth: Richard Habring speaks! (If this doesn't bring in a few readers, what will???)
Hello fellow Purists! Last week I posted some feelings about the movement of the chrono minute hand—specifically my preference for the semi-instantaneous "jump" or some, rather than the continuous movement of others. Cazelea was good enough to sift throug...
I think you may have forgotten to add something here. [nt]
Sorry about that, message body was empty earlier.
Does their e-mail still end with aon.at?
I tried to contact them about an entirely different topic... and I still haven't received any answer
Excellent! Thank you, Fred, for pursuing the subject . . .
. . . and Richard for providing the illuminating explanation. Reading between the lines, it seems that continuous chrono minutes operation is more complex than jumping. I'm still wondering if the latter is more efficient in terms of energy consumption tha...
Yes… I asked that for you, but it didn't get answered, per se. More than likely any savings in energy would be slight enough to be disregarded in favor of fewer parts?
But I'll keep a tally of unanswered questions and "re-submit." I'm sure that he is sincere in his wish to answer all of our questions.
Sorry gentlemen!
Though often looking out for Posts with technical Content, I missed this one! cheers Richard