foversta[PuristSPro Moderator]
20814
I will be frank with you Ed...
First of all, thanks a lot for the report!
But sorry, no, the Oceanographic 4000.... I can't... I found it bulky, oversized with the feeling to have a big car powered by a small engine...
I was very seduced by some watches of the 2012 collection (Ferrari, Classic Thin Skeleton) but this one gave me the opposite reaction.

Thanks for the report!
Fx
Thank you for the report!
By: KIH : September 15th, 2012-04:38
One vote for carbon. I like carbon or carbon pattern whether it is really carbon or not. This model, as always, is either you love or hate, and I happen to love. I am not a diver and not keen about the diving watches, modern or vintage, but this one looks...
Call me biased...
By: JToddH : January 20th, 2016-18:04
But my vote is for the Ti ! I've had my Oceanographic 4000 for about three years and absolutely love it. Sure, it's big, it's bold and not for the faint hearted. When I purchased it, I wasn't sure how much wrist time it would get. As it turns out, I wear ...
Clive Joel
By: clive.joel : April 17th, 2016-12:40
I have owned the Carbon Black Oceanographic 4000 and the legibility during the day was bad but in the dark you could not see the hands at all? It says its Black Superluminova. Really confusing and too stealth-like but amazing looking!!!