Sometimes it appears as if bits and pieces had accidentially been exchanged, and a simple swap could reslove the issue. This is partulcarly the case if, in my personal opinion only of course, a certain watch seems to be inconsistent, be it design and choi...
Actual functions are separate issue. I also think that the differences in terms of indications would have little influence on the general movement architecture. Best, Magnus
Notably, I think the Moritz-Grossman uses its movement style to demonstrate the careful craftsmanship and movement finishing, even despite the more modern dial; whereas, the Czapek may have its movement style because such a style saves the costs of a more...
In my opinion, Moritz Grossman\'s movement and finishing matches the brand perfectly. At Czapek I agree, the finishing matches not the expectation. The movement would nicely fit though, with a more traditional, "established" finish...
of the Moritz Grossmann pieces. I am not referring to the quality of the finishing or the execution, I am solely referring to the design and the concept. Front is restrained and fairly modern, the back is a flashback to the past. Something does not match ...
I have not seen a Czapek in the real so far, so I am not going to comment on them. However I saw and tried some Großmanns and each time I was a little confused by something that I could not quite express. No you pointed it out. It is that inherent inconsi...
When you look at it from a purely aesthetic point of view, it does make sense. Now the functionality of each movement is a different argument. This is something that I've noticed more and more in recent timepieces - especially at SIHH 2017. The montblanc ...