Tony C.
1239
Hi Nicolas...
This is an interesting one, as the script (which is very difficult to copy well) appears to be original. I also have a hard time faulting it in most other respects.
Having said that, I posted it because I believe that there is a "dead" give away, suggesting that it is almost certainly a redial. I welcome any corrections if I am wrong, but this is my perspective: It reads "T SWISS MADE T", yet this dressy style of dial and hands typically had no luminous material applied. So why, pray tell, would a simple, elegant dial such as this have not one, but two references to Tritium?
Regards,
Tony C.
Hi Nicolas...
By: Tony C. : November 17th, 2009-00:33
This is an interesting one, as the script (which is very difficult to copy well) appears to be original. I also have a hard time faulting it in most other respects. Having said that, I posted it because I believe that there is a "dead" give away, suggesti...
Not original...
By: MartyW : November 17th, 2009-02:15
Tony, I agree with everything that you've said. Everything looks good with the exception of the "T Swiss Made T". Two problems: it shouldn't be "T" with the reasons you've stated, and the location of it. Otherwise the watch does look very nice. Am I corre...
Agree
By: MartyW : November 17th, 2009-08:40
Tony, it is indeed a very nice redial job. Normally the "Swiss Made" would have been placed a lot higher on the dial with a less skillful craftsman. This one is actually almost as good as the original one. I suppose it's not possible to get the replacemen...