I posted a picture of the two watches above. See my answer to Dirk. [nt]

Jaeger 4 ATM Ref E 13001. Some thoughts.

By: amanico : November 26th, 2017-10:32

I already reviewed that watch, some years ago. For those who are interested to learn more about it, please click here: As I often do, I am hunting several informations, here and there, and at the Manufacture, to try to better know a watch. One fact: Ther...

Jaeger-LeCoultre

Jaeger 4 ATM Ref E 13001. Some thoughts.

What a coincidence

No, this one is a Shark Ref E 2643. [nt]

Ok, merci! [nt]

Another picture for you.

superb duo, my friend!

I will post some topics about vintage Jaeger Lecoultre Chronographs. That's an interesting theme. [nt]

Thanks, i enjoyed reading this and it was very informative. Question - i know this watch as E 2643 . Is that also correct or a different watch ? [nt]

E 2643 is the Shark. A totally different watch. [nt]

thanks ! [nt]

I posted a picture of the two watches above. See my answer to Dirk. [nt]

thanks again !. Is 4 atm pretty good for a chronograph from the 70`s ? I have also seen Garnier and Mathey Tissot watches with the same look.

Yes, I know the Garnier. I saw it. I would go for the Jaeger, too. I don't know the story behind the Garnier. [nt]

Very cool watch and certainly a reference to remember.

My pleasure, HSTE. [nt]

I caught your wink about “666” 😈👹😆

Aaah, finally! Can you believe it? I had to have this number! [nt]

It was preordained! 😇 [nt]

;) [nt]

Very interesting & informative read & pics, dear Nico !.. I also only have seen & touched yours.. And I have to say..

It is quite a rare bird, indeed. Thanks for reading, and for your comments, my friend. [nt]