watchthatman
2532
I still like the MUT 41, and the master control from early 2010s. If I really wanted ultra thin, it would be a gold or platinum beast that like 4.05 mm thick [nt]
No message body
SIHH 2019: Some thoughts on the Jaeger Lecoultre Master Ultra Thin Date.
The Master Ultra Thin Date first came in the catalogue in 2014, in rose gold, then, in 2015, in steel. This watch had a 40 mm case, 7, 45 mm high. We also had the Champagne dial, unveiled in 2016. This year, Jaeger Lecoultre revisits this model. With a sm...
This is what makes picking out a JLC so difficult for me, they offer so many incredible models. I can go into any other AD and pick what I want in about 6 seconds.
IWC. Patek, Rolex, Breitling etc I know which I would get. Every time I think I've decided which JLC to get I change my mind, with limited funds I can't get them all. The MUT is definitely one of my choices. I may have as much trouble when it comes time t...
I understand, Thomas. I too have a list which is longer when it comes to JLC than when it comes to many other brands. With a Master Ultra Thin, you cannot go wrong.
The simpler, the better, for me, when it comes to the Master Ultra Thin... Best, Nicolas
My question is...
when JLC will update the movement with the new 70h power reserve? Best Yiannis
A lot of people ask this question but what does it bring?
I really like my 8 days, but anything lower and without a power reserve indicator does not present much interest. I see it as the last fashion more than anything. I wind up my MUT everyday as I know I have to and I am fine with that. Best, É.
with date - is this Nicos’ post ?!
in fact the MUT seconds sub-dial version st 38,5 mm - compelling version I guess ! Best, Mahesh.,
I like the frame around the date...
however I prefer the indices on my MUT Date 40mm. The 9 and 3 tips form a perfect circle when connected to the top of the date window and the bottom of the applied JL. A circle within a circle. It's subtle, but I measured it and it's truly sublime. -Dean