Officine Panerai

...  

Now that’s for sure a great achievement: becoming a classic immediately at birth. May this honeymoon phase never stop. I wonder when you will be able to wear another piece again. 😊 All the best Thomas

to the case of the 372?

...  

Forget about this detail in choice gents!

This case type in the 6152/1 family was used for Rolex movement (without second hand). Angelus (with second hand) was set in cases having rounded sides like one for Fiddy 127. Just wondering, why your initiative team decided on such a mixed construction ?... 

I know that they wanted to have it as close as possible. But of course Panerai didn’t / couldn’t wave everything trough. On one site it would have increased the prizes and On the other site I think as well Panerai wanted to “protect” some of the older mod... 

The 1080 is the closest watch out there to the 6154-1. its beyond the dreams and expectations of everyone. That’s just cool.

PAM 267 is the closest to Panerai 6152/1-A. Then, PAM 127. IMO, 1088 goes after 267 and 127. Nevertheless, 1088 is a nice modern interpretation ! Wear it in good health!

Why are they closer to it? The 6152/1 does not have a super doomed glas. Fiddy and 267 do have more text on it. That’s the most obvious difference already . You should exchange with the founders. look on these pictures with 1080 and the vintage 6152/1 MM....  

Historical Panerai 6152/1 (right on your photo) was equipped with Rolex movements having just two hands and case with shard case edges. Its modern interpretations are 372, 663, 605 etc. Modification of Panerai 6152/1-A was equipped with Angelus movements ... 

...