John-E-Mac
1804
I remember seeing one at an AD. It was one of those pieces they pushed, because the other models were sold.
They hyped the destro theme along with it having a power reserve. Very rare and sought after.
Basically an upside down 090. I thought it was a lazy attempt to create a model. Not the first or the last poor execution.
Thanks for being brave enough to share that model! -John
To continue my theme...
Of the “less than loved” references, I submit another (I am joking, of course— we all have different tastes, which makes this forum so interesting). I know this doesn’t do it for the traditionalists out there, but the size and bracelet suit me, not to men...
I'll play.....
I see your travesty and raise you...mine. As for being different, I don't like mine ...
When it was produced....
the 123 was IMO, the ugliest model they had ever produced. Then came the.....380 and in subsequent years, too many to mention IMO of course, I've never used it, I only bought it to add to a lefties collection I was pursuing.
I remember seeing one at an AD. It was one of those pieces they pushed, because the other models were sold.
They hyped the destro theme along with it having a power reserve. Very rare and sought after. Basically an upside down 090. I thought it was a lazy attempt to create a model. Not the first or the last poor execution. Thanks for being brave enough to share...
I imagine your Panerai is what...
The purists think of... large and clean dial. Very nice. Mine is the 42mm version. Cheers
I like it
I like the green dial on yours. I typically prefer leather strap or bracelet over rubber, but in this case it all works well together. nice piece!