It is always interesting to read on other's opinions on the forum, and i have a few issues with what you have written.
About the 368, why do you say that it is not in the league of the 217 at all? Is it just cause of the wording Marine Militare? Other than that, virtually all aspects are the same, with the fact that the 368 is crafted out of titanium compared to 217's 316L stainless, shouldnt the material itself already be considered to be more superior? While the 217 JUST has an ETA, which is a way to common and cheap movement, would the in-house that is found in the 368 in fact elevate it further?
As for the 372, how is it more different to the 232 than the 368? They both are base watches, and capability wise is almost the same, except one is ETA and the other is an in house. Wouldnt the seconds hand of the 368 set it apart even more from the 232? And of course the 8 days vs 3 days of the 372 which is closer to 232's 56 hours.
Just for some discussion
Stephen