sergio
[Panerai Moderator]
5742
Yes I remember the...
instance vividly. As a matter of fact, I had a close look at both watches, because I couldn't believe how different they felt on my wrist. I normally would ignore such minutiae but in this case, the difference (on MY wrist) was so obvious, I had to..look into it. I don't have one anymore but, when it comes to Panerais, if I HAD a spouse, she'd have to bite the bullet. Cheers 
PAM673...
...the most "ergonomic" and best fitting 47mm, 1950 Luminor case out there I.M.O. Here’s with his..sibling. ...
Two of the best!
The 587 is my favorite (visually) but you were the one Sergio who helped me to understand the subtle case differences the two.
Visually the 587....
on the wrist 673 hands down. As I have written before, the 587 is a very chunky watch, on my wrist doubly so, unfortunately.
Actually....no
The 673 is not chunky at all. I don't know how to explain it but, of all the 47mm, 1950 models I have (except for the 375, of course) I've nicknamed it "The Glove"
'The Glove' -- nice!
As you may remember sergio, I bought a 673 because I could't find a 587. Then I found a 587 later. I thought the cases were quite similar but you did a detailed comparison highlighting differences. I'll pull them both out and compare the fit and feel. I c...
Yes I remember the...
instance vividly. As a matter of fact, I had a close look at both watches, because I couldn't believe how different they felt on my wrist. I normally would ignore such minutiae but in this case, the difference (on MY wrist) was so obvious, I had to..look ...
