Omega Seamaster 300 ST 165 024.
Another interesting and nice looking one I saw. Big screw in crown with this dial configuration instead of the big triangle, I have to check that. Love the patina of the bezel, too. I miss a ST 165 024 in my collection, they are so cool! Best, Nicolas ...
I thought the NTTD Omega has too many modern traits
To actually make sense as a vintage inspired piece, comparing to the Seamaster 300 for example (thinner lugs and bezel, no crown guard). However, this case and bezel configuration has many similarities to the recent 300m, particularly the NTTD edition. A ...
Was the asymmetrical case originally for the military issue watches?
Could it be that a (number of) surplus case(s) were used for the civilian market?
Any informations, why Rolex took over for the ministry of defence in 1970?
Better quality? Prices?
I tend to think quality since the beginning of the quartz crisis
Just at the time, Rolex got better through it then Omega
Yes, but i still think that, during the 70s and 80s,
Rolex sold much more watches and with higher price and higher perceived quality. This would explain why Omega really enhanced their standards and the price of their pieces from the 90s till today, while Rolex is perceiced as having only an evolution in te...
Omega had some rather strange contraptions in the 80s and 70s.
I guess panic and missing direction where to go is to blame for that. Some of those were actually very bad! The re-vitalization of Omega came with two gentlemen I have had the honor to meet and socialize with at some occasions and whom I hold very high as...
Last one seems plausible!
Hans Wilsdorf was a mastermind in that respect, but he's been already dead at this point.
I understand, and Omega is not really where I know the most.
I tried to look up some old pictures I have in my repository from the times when I was participating in lecturing value assessment training for Norwegian watchmakers. And you are right, the military issue (broad arrow, "t-in-a-circle" etc also showed symm...
. . . and to think these were plentiful . . .
. . . just six or seven years ago. I was offered one for a paltry sum. Not in good condition and without bracelet, but the very same 165.024 today would be > $5K. And a bargain at that price. :-(
thanks for sharing this, Nicolas ..
Vintage divers such as this is very cool. Condition aside, it will be a pleasure to wear! Be well and stay safe.