Omega

Omega CK 2393 from year 1939.

By: amanico : October 4th, 2021-20:23

82 years old... I deeply regret not having added this one in my collection. 38, 3 mm case, superb dial, olive pushers... All I love. Well, it has a snap back case, I would have preferred a screw-in, but not a no go, by far! What a watch! Best, Nicolas ...

Clearly.

Omega CK 2393 from year 1939.

A spritely looking example mon ami

If only I could have taken it!!!

Stunning time capsule!

Thanks, JK.

I guess this one must’ve been part of the inspiration for the new chronoscope

agree. stunning

Thanks, G M.

Yes, but the vintage is much better and nicer, in my eyes. The new one is an aberration.

strong feeling on the new one i see...

Clearly.

I hope you dont mind but may i ask for my benefit which elements of the new release you feel could have been different?

This dial has nothing to see with such a case. That's a weird mismatch, for me.

that's a good point and i can see what you mean...

Aaah, here my opinion would be totally different! Speedmasterizing such a dial is a blaspheme, for me.

Pure vintage aura from a golden era. Beautiful!

Hard to beat, indeed. And the evidence that there is also something outside the Speedmaster! ;)

You could get the Chronoscope . . .

Everyday I will favor, and not by a small margin, the CK 2393 I posted.

As the Romans would say . . .

Ave Turus. ;)

Don Turo . . .

Piacere! ;)