Hello Nilo! I regret not having viewed this post before...

... to add my comment. I have been after a vintage Railmaster for a long time without finding one in good condition and price. Always in love with the dial of the Railmaster I looked for the modern rendtion in 36,2 or 39,2 case but coudn´t find one either. I finally got this 41 mm case watch, bought brand new at a local AD which is a very beautiful watch indeed with a wonderful movement, but somehow such a big size prevented me to really fall in love with it. Though I own other Omega watches with similar case size (e.g. Speedmaster) and my Longines LD also sports a similar size, this Omega Railmaster feels and looks much bigger on my wrist by some strange reason I can´t explain. Anyway I still keep it and wear it from time to time. I guess I would be much happier with the smaller 36,2 mm case. I have read somewhere that Omega is going to launch a new version with the old style full lug case of the originals, en suite with their present SM300 rendition. I´m waiting to see if this is true. I wish to share some pictures of mine Have a great week end! Very cordially, Abel-

💰364 Marketplace Listings for Omega›

Wednesday picture - Omega Railmaster Co-Axial ...

By: nilomis : May 27th, 2015-04:10

Team, Got it few weeks back and I'm truly impressed by the amazing simplicity and outstanding accuracy of the "old" 2405 Co-Axial movement. Zero deviations after few days on my wrist and watch drawer. 1) Against the beautiful Fall blue sky: 2) A B&W p...

Great shots!

By: Ares501 - Mr Green : May 27th, 2015-05:54

I hope that Sir Graham just took sabbatical nothing less nothing more My choice would be Sir Graham's big one but that's just megalomaniac me :) Sincerely D

The leviathan Graham . . .

By: Dr No : May 27th, 2015-11:06

. . . and Melvyn (twice!) owned was really a different genus, Nilo. The manual winding movement in that iteration was derived from a Unitas 6498 ébauche. I was extremely close to getting one of the 36 mm versions . . . . . . which was a perfect fit on my ...

Two options ...

By: nilomis : May 27th, 2015-14:12

Art, Or the watch on your wrist is not the 36mm or your wrist is thinner that I was believing. Anyway, it's a pure watch and a manual wind one can be more pure. Cheers, Nilo

My wrist is thin . . .

By: Dr No : May 28th, 2015-10:46

. . . my waist, not. :-)

Nice instructional shots and interesting to peek - or guess- about next year's iterations.. ;))

By: hs111 : May 31st, 2015-03:14

I\'m currently deliberating about the new SM 300 Co-axials.. - Still Steel/black vs Ti/ blue - not yet fully decided, so far. A bit a pity, that there is no blue in steel.. Also a bit undecided as of prize difference, especially so, as the Ti version is n...

Very nice! :)

By: blomman Mr Blue : May 28th, 2015-11:32

Me at work yesterday... Didn't have time to post until now! Best Blomman ...

Really like this one from "Holy Trinity" (?!).. Although a bit blurred pic, still very recognizable !..

By: hs111 : May 30th, 2015-07:18

I\'m still on my hunt for a decent SM 300, (2913, or more realistically 165 014, maybe alternatively 165 024) ! Quite a number of "empty" kilometers so far.. But at same time I\'m interested in the modern (2015?) Seamaster Co-Axial, blue dial / Titanium.....

I don't know what is happening but ...

By: nilomis : May 30th, 2015-07:27

The 165 024, that was quite common here, just vanished!!! I'm hunting one but so far, after months and months ... nothing. Cheers, Nilo

Thx for the Kind info !.. Indeed, Last 2 years in my realm/ City no decent SM 300 sighted.. ;))

By: hs111 : May 30th, 2015-07:46

So my quest continues.. Also good luck for your own hunt !! Thx again & Best, hs

Yes, the CK 2914 part of the Holy Trinity...

By: blomman Mr Blue : May 31st, 2015-00:54

And if you find your 2913 - well the next logical step would be 2914! ;) For the step after that, 2915 - that's when it starts to get really tricky! Best Blomman

1Q be allowed: what in fact is difference between SM 2913 & SM 165.014 ( apart from 2913 being the earlier= 1st SM); obviously apart from the hands ( mvmt ?)

By: hs111 : May 31st, 2015-02:51

.. Have tried to check in Forum Search, but no quite successful, yet !.. Sorry, my ignorance - I think to remember that yours is a 2913 ( with Lollipop) and Nico\'s is also 2913 (?!). I think, I\'ve recently located one 165.014, but the correct bezel is m...

The second gen Seamaster 300s differed in several ways, h . . .

By: Dr No : May 31st, 2015-13:23

. . . the movement being the most significant (cal 552 vs cal 501 in the CK2913), but also the case (twisted lugs vs solid), bezel (wider, and without the 'eye'), crown, and probably a few more, these being the obvious differences right off the top of my ...

Thx kindly, Art for this valuable info !.. As I'm still an Omega newbie, there will be a lot to learn.. Thx & Best for your upcoming new week !.. :)) [nt]

By: hs111 : May 31st, 2015-13:34

I think you got most of it, Art!

By: blomman Mr Blue : May 31st, 2015-14:47

The 165.014 you show, HS, have the straight lugs. The bezel is there, but the inlay is gone... Also the dial feature different indexes, broader, non sharp teeth. Candle stick hands. To find a new bezel inlay is not easy... What I haven't figured out yet i...

Hello Nilo! I regret not having viewed this post before...

By: Subexplorer : June 19th, 2015-06:57

I bet that there will be a Railmaster "vintage" around...

By: nilomis : June 19th, 2015-07:25

The case, should be similar to the SM 300 Master (straight lugs). Meanwhile, I'm very happy with the 41mm case size (I feel small watches ... too small). Cheers, Nilo