mac_omega
1375
I think it might...
Hi,
I think Cal. 861 as well as Cal 321 are among the most accurate chronograph movements I ever owned!
I have both of them and both are running within a range of about 3-4 seconds a day - so I do adjustment of time only once a week
You just have to be patient when regulating/adjusting the movement and you might achieve similar results.
Just my experience
Erich
Moon Watch accuracy!
By: draganmikki1 : June 13th, 2011-09:04
I bought twelve years old Speedmaster Moon Watch Caliber1861, recently. It is in perfect condition. It was loosing exactly 1 minute a day, although it is difficult to say as it doesn't have hacking seconds hand. I had it serviced by good independent watch...
Depends of several factors
By: nilomis : June 13th, 2011-10:24
Here is my cents. I'm sure that a more experienced person can offer a more solid advise. The Moon Watch movement, 861/1861 etc. cannot be called a chronometer (or being COSC certified) because, IMHO, is a movement that is designed for sturdiness and depen...
I think it might...
By: mac_omega : June 13th, 2011-11:15
Hi, I think Cal. 861 as well as Cal 321 are among the most accurate chronograph movements I ever owned! I have both of them and both are running within a range of about 3-4 seconds a day - so I do adjustment of time only once a week You just have to be pa...
Case opening?
By: draganmikki1 : June 14th, 2011-13:22
Thank you very much Graham! I think the only way for me to make gradual adjustments would be to do it myself, as you suggested, or I would need to make frequent trips to the watchmaker. So, the next question is, how do you open the case; what tool do you ...
if you look on ebay...
By: G99 : June 14th, 2011-13:31
if you look on ebay you'll see 1000's of caseback openers for sale. you dont need an expensive one, just an adjustable one like mine in the attached pic. make sure you adjust it well so it doesnt slip and scratch the back, but these are far better than th...
Much appreciated!
By: draganmikki1 : June 13th, 2011-16:17
First of all, thank you all for your helpful contribution. Everything mentioned makes sense and I will certainly try to regulate the precision of this lovely watch. Someone mentioned the service history, and that could be the problem, as from new, meaning...
3.5 sec/day
By: aroma : June 14th, 2011-01:17
That's what my 1967 321 does - far better than I'd expected it to as they were never chronometers. My 1966 Seamaster 300 managed +/- 0 sec/day at the last count - and not even COSC Yes your Speedie should do/could do better Cheers Andrew