amanico
[JLC Moderator]
400012
I understand. Aesthetically, it is eye catching. But the Seamaster is more consistent, with its automatic movement, when, originally, the Railmaster was manual winding. [nt]
No message body
The big fuss of 2017?
Yesterday evening me and my wife (somewhat forced her to come but she actually found a watch that could compete with her Day-Date to my anxiety) had the pleasure to attend a very well organized mini Basel show in Amsterdam. Blanc de Blancs liquids and 2 M...
That was what I initially also thought. Because I always love the pics of the vintage 300. But handeling them real life my preference now is #1 Railmaster #2 Speedmaster #3 Seamaster.
Weirdly because the Railmaster is too small for my standards. I guess not so anymore...
Yes, but as Baron has stated (and I fully concur): they are not the real (vintage) deal anyway. So why bother with some sort of 'correctness'?
So many people, so many opinions Not sure what I will end up with and how many but at a minimum one of these Anniversaries is coming home with me.
I was originally thinking Seamaster ...
... but now Railmaster. Wonderful photos -- thank you! John
Among the 3, I would go for... the Trilogy.
I actually kind of like the extra text, sets it apart. I know it is blasphemy here, but it is my opinion.
Railmaster still my favorite.
No pie-pan dial on the Speedy 60th is a disappointment.
