Dr No
[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37541
Last batch . . .
. . . of photos; which can you identify?
S
T
U
V
W
What I can say with a high degree of probablity is that there were examples of 2915, 2998, 105.002, 105.003, 105.012, and 145.012 present. There are some obvious models here, but others will require informed sleuthing.
Art
Dr No's photo files, Part II . . .
. . . and also hailing from 2016. Sometime toward the end of that year there was a Phillips Speedmaster auction. I was able to photograph the assemblage at the Omega boutique in LA. Unfortunately I didn't take notes, so there will be some that will be dif...
Last batch . . .
. . . of photos; which can you identify? R S T U V W What I can say with a high degree of probablity is that there were examples of 2915, 2998, 105.002, 105.003, 105.012, and 145.012 present. There are some obvious models here, but others will require inf...
There were at least three 2915s in the auction, Myles. I must've posted the 105.002 . . .
. . . twice, as both you and Nicolas correctly picked out the scarcest 321 ref from different photos. Art
A= 3595.52. ?
B= Omega Speedmaster CoAxial Rattrapante Torino Olympic 3886.30.37 ? C= BA 145.022-69 ? I= ST 105.002-62 ? H= ck 2915-3 ? F= Omega Speedmaster Mark II 145.034 — 1971
Good guesses, Myles. The Mk II is actually solid 18 kt gold, one of eight . . .
. . . made, so presumably BA 145.034. Impressed!
I had wanted to get a speedy but
Not quite for a long time becos of the many variants (both vintage and modern) that were overwhelming when I was figuring out which one to get. Fortunately the Ed White 321 came along and I decided that would be the one to save me the agony😅. A big notebo...