Franco
353
MMMhhh ..
... the 166.024 dial that you mention would have a date aperture which would not suit a 14755.
If it is 165.024 dial, I would get that relumed by somebody like Aldo in Italy, rather than having one redialled fom scratch.
A 165.024 dial could be washed of the old/ruined luminous (if you want so), slightly olied to bring back the dark colour, and then relumed to match the luminous of the hands.
I have not seen a credible dial for SM300 done from scratch, by anybody.
BWs
Franco
MMMhhh ..
By: Franco : March 8th, 2012-16:58
... the 166.024 dial that you mention would have a date aperture which would not suit a 14755. If it is 165.024 dial, I would get that relumed by somebody like Aldo in Italy, rather than having one redialled fom scratch. A 165.024 dial could be washed of ...
Re: MMMhhh
By: pmontoyap : March 9th, 2012-12:16
Hi Franco, Thanks for your input, you´re correct I meant the 165.024 no date dial. I got it new old stock so I´d rather not touch them. The point is I need the triangular markers ala 14755 so a relume will no be enough. It will have to be painted from scr...
Ok
By: Franco : March 9th, 2012-13:59
Hi well, certainly Aldo does not do redials .... but I repeat, nobody does good redials of SM300 dials. The one you show, pardon me, is horrible. The Omega symbol is totally wrong, The lume has been given with with some gross imprecisions. Plus the whole ...