Indigo
109
I've looked at it with digital and optical maginification to 592 models on Christies and other resources
and the text seems ok. I had my suspicions about the kerning between the 'C' and the 'o' as well as the 'T', but I honestly don't see much issues than that. I even checked the comma between 'Patek' and 'Philippe' and period dials (1940-1943) usually don't have them. Appreciate your feedback!
[Help] Looking for information on this Patek
I have this old darling but there isn't much info I could find online. Old Patek inscription (no comma between Patek and Philippe, don't know if it was erased or if it shipped like that), rose gold dial on a rose gold case, 32mm, all marks on the back of ...
Hi Do you have pics of the inside of the case
The movement and the back of the case Thanks Julian
Hammer head with 143 = made by Classicor SA
I would def get an extract to make sure the case goes with the movement Initially I thought the case was a French import Movement look OK Julian
Nice movement
You are looking at a second batch of 12-120 movement, made between 1940 and 1950. For Patek you can hardly set up a numbering rule for the cases, so the only way of knowing something about the watch is to ask Patek. References were not always engraved on ...
Thanks, slungu and Julian!
I'll go ahead and ask for an extract. This information is very helpful!
The printing on the dial looks pretty bad...
So at best you are looking at a re-dial.
re dial.
I would not redial. A cleaning sometimes is more than enough. I sent my 2508 for movement restoration and dial cleaning to Patek. Costs and time have been reasonable, if you want to keep it. Best regards, Lars
I'm not suggesting he re-dial the watch....
I am suggesting that the dial has already been re-done.
I've looked at it with digital and optical maginification to 592 models on Christies and other resources
and the text seems ok. I had my suspicions about the kerning between the 'C' and the 'o' as well as the 'T', but I honestly don't see much issues than that. I even checked the comma between 'Patek' and 'Philippe' and period dials (1940-1943) usually don't...
Could be Ref. 592
Judging from 12-120 movement, 32mm diameter and stepped bezel, this could be ref. 592 from 40s. I could be wrong....
This is actually correct!
Just double-checked with Juichi Nagayama and John Reardon and they confirmed it's a 592. Thank you, teetann!
Great to learn that...
these two gentlemen confirmed the reference. They are best in business. Thanks for sharing. Cheers!