Mark in Paris[Purist]
10488
You may be right
I read this "enamel" dial somewhere but I can't find it on Patek website in the watch's description.
It seems I was wrong so thanks a lot for correcting Suitbert, I'll edit my post.
Yes, it could be great to see that movement used in another reference too.
Thanks for posting!
Cheers, Mark
5959P
By: autowind : June 19th, 2015-17:35
A gorgeous watch even more attractive because of it's size (not popular today but a measure of true craftsmanship), amazingly difficult and complex complication in such a small package, and a movement that actually fills the entire case unlike so many hoc...
A quintessential Patek
By: tahoeblue : June 20th, 2015-09:21
This is one of those movements and watches that defines Patek, and separates them from the crowd. Not only is it about making complicated watches, it is so much more impressive and desirable to make these slim and elegant. Not much that is more cool than ...
Nicely put
By: Mark in Paris : June 21st, 2015-07:03
I think that making thin a complicated movement is a complication in itself, and an elegant one. The 5950 is even more appealing, I agree, even if it is more a matter of taste in that field. The complicated watch we usually see are impressive by their big...
If memory serves well.....
By: SuitbertW : July 13th, 2015-16:04
Hello Mark, if memory serves well, I'd have to add a tiny correction :-) As far as I know this movement doesn't have an isolator for the rattrapante. Also, the dial is a "simple" metal dial with white laquer surface, no email.....the reason was the additi...
You may be right
By: Mark in Paris : July 14th, 2015-02:30
I read this "enamel" dial somewhere but I can't find it on Patek website in the watch's description. It seems I was wrong so thanks a lot for correcting Suitbert, I'll edit my post. Yes, it could be great to see that movement used in another reference too...