WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Photography

Richard, I appreciate the comment...

 

I spoke to a good friend who owns / uses both cameras (LX100 and X100T) and he mentioned that the macro of the LX100 is very good.  I am fairly sure I could "succeed" with either camera ; ).

Please see my reply to Avatar where I mentioned the two reasons that the Sony did not make my short list... still the reviews that I have read (about the RX100 IV) have all been positive... Pros/Cons as with any product.

The Sony (and Panasonic) models under discussion are variable maximum aperture zooms, which means that except for wide angle the Sony is using about the same f-stop-to-shutter-speed combination as the other two (the Fuji being a fixed 35mm-f/2 lens).  What Sony does with that capture (noise, rendering, etc.) is another story, the Panasonic is reported to have a slight color shift (easy to correct in post or maybe by custom shifting the WB default).  One does have to balance requirements and/or expectations.

The build quality of the X100T, particularly the ergonomics is very well done IMHO.  The funny thing is, the Leica Q (TYP 116) was even better in the hands, maybe as a result the LX100 felt very tiny ; )

Let me know what you end up doing... BTW why are you considering to change out the D-Lux6?

Casey

  login to reply