WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Rolex

good point. at the same time I find everything

 

getting so cluttered.  if everything is "special" in the end nothing is special.  Perhaps grouping watch companies by size would be more focused.  Large companies such as Rolex and Seiko and Omega would have similarities of scale and purpose. Small companies such as Patek and Vacheron would be in very a different group.  And the very small boutique houses would be another still.  Three forums for three types of watches, plus (perhaps) a vintage forum (coverall all makes) though even that seems just another way to divide enthusiasts instead of bringing them together.

The "brand" fan club forums become too much awe and back slapping and fawning over every new model, and for me that reduces the quality of the information and discussion. 

And let me bury in this post...as often happens in discussions...a question about Patek.  What exactly designates a Calatrava?  I see the name attached to lots of Pateks...but the only time I have seen it defined is when a dealer mentioned the Calatrava crown as if it was specific to that model.  In my days of infatuation with the name Patek, I picked one up and it had all the style and look I wanted (35mm case, broad hands, center seconds), yet it never felt that special on the wrist and after a few hours I would take it off and put on something I liked more.  Now the Patek has become my "wall clock"...it hangs on a push pin over my desk...I enjoy looking at it, and it seems quite happy there as well. 

 

 

 

  login to reply
💰1867 Marketplace Listings for Rolex