Champthekid
5899
Agree. I just don’t see Rolex
allowing the elimination of their name on the dial. I say “no way”, but my goodness have I been wrong in the past regarding watch guesses 😁
Rolex GMT MASTER 6542 Tiffany Dial. A special and intriguing one.
Gregineugene posted it some weeks ago. I was skeptic about this one, and did some searches. I found nothing conclusive about it. What intrigues me the most is that Rolex didn't sign this dial. I never saw one Rolex watch without the Rolex name on it. And ...
Loop Jose Pereztroika in on this one.
It’s so odd that I would bet it makes for an entire article on Perezcope.com.
The dicipline should always be there - Buy the seller.
There is an art to writing up the description - The question is ???? "This unprecedented combination, never recorded in known literature or market appearances, positions the present example at the very forefront of Rolex scholarship. Adding a further laye...
Agree. I just don’t see Rolex
allowing the elimination of their name on the dial. I say “no way”, but my goodness have I been wrong in the past regarding watch guesses 😁
However Emmanuel did find this example...
Even though its not signed on the dial its signed on the crown, inside the back cover and the movement. pic from Emmanuel's post: Rolex: Choose Your Eaton Century Club Rolex ...