adam.keith
31
Agree with Velociphile
Get the current 14060M. Since you (as I do) prefer the beautiful clean dial of the non-date Submariner, and want something unquestionably robust you can wear all the time that can "take a hit" and shrug it off, this reference is your clear choice for a go-to Rolex Sub. Depending upon your preference you can get the 14060M in non-COSC or COSC-certified formats---while the latter has the busier dial with more printing, I like at it, as it creates a modern successor to the famous 5512.
Few watches define "classic" as well as the no-date Rolex Submariner, and I'm sure you'll find it a watch you'll wear daily with great joy. And, as an added bonus--these watches (as do most Rolex sports models) just get better looking the more character they get from wear....at least in my humble opinion.
Best,
Adam
Intending to buy a Submariner
By: MWL : July 5th, 2010-07:23
Hi there, This is my first post here, but I've been lurking around for a while reading some excellent reviews etc, and have as such been influenced into getting myself a submariner, as my Reverso Squadra is getting quite beaten up being my day-to-day watc...
Agree with Velociphile
By: adam.keith : July 5th, 2010-17:01
Get the current 14060M. Since you (as I do) prefer the beautiful clean dial of the non-date Submariner, and want something unquestionably robust you can wear all the time that can "take a hit" and shrug it off, this reference is your clear choice for a go...
Sounds good
By: MWL : July 6th, 2010-00:41
Thanks for the quick response. Ill be going on a hunt when I get back to Hong Kong, so Ill keep those numbers in mind. As to the COSC or non-COSC, is there any difference in reference number? Thanks, Maxi
14060...
By: Slugo : July 10th, 2010-16:40
IMO the no-date Sub is definitely the way to fly. Here's a pic of my first A-series 14060, followed by my recently purchased COSC 14060M. I love them both, but prefer the older version because of its simple design and cleanliness... 14060... 14060M COSC.....