All i can say is there is no watch dial related evidence.

That is the problem of the internet information flows freely and quoted time and again.

I simply say where are all the cases of watch owners claims in courts of law backed by medical examination.

I am no scientist or doctor. I just think the claims are not substantiated.

Look at this far more a problem

But not everyone is unconcerned. In May 2015, a group of 190 independent scientists from 39 countries, who in total have written more than 2,000 papers on the topic, called on the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and national governments to develop stricter controls on cell-phone radiation. They point to growing research—as well as the classification of cell-phone radiation as a possible carcinogen in 2011 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the WHO—suggesting that the low levels of radiation from cell phones could have potentially cancer-causing effects.

“I think the overall evidence that wireless radiation might cause adverse health effects is now strong enough that it’s almost unjustifiable for government agencies and scientists not to be alerting the public to the potential hazards,” says David O. Carpenter, M.D., director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany in New York and one of the authors of the recent letter to the U.N. and WHO.

....but then other studies say no. ANd where do we store our phones ... in our pockets. T I think we should spread that news to keep the phone away from the groin area equslly to the brain area.

My point is not be dismissive but where is the real evidence. We know smoking causes cancer you would think that in lat 50 years they would have a mountain of evidence with watches.

It has been discussed so many times and all it does is create disinformation.

Oldie but goodie Rolex 6569 Oyster Perpetual using cal. 1030. OCC

By: Bill : November 26th, 2016-14:42

All lume plots perfectly intact. Rolex 6569 from around 1958 with a 37x,xxx serial. Silver indexes and tapered dauphine hands. Powered by calibre 1030 chronometer rated self winding movement with sweep seconds. Bill ...

Beautiful simplicity

By: Mikey11 : November 26th, 2016-16:20

Great post bill.

It is very basic but it still speaks Rolex.

By: Bill : November 26th, 2016-17:24

The small details. Raised crown, Quasi Dauphine hands, 3 6 9 battons, Lume plots all around, Blued seconds hand. All the Rolex DNA. Thanks for looking. Bill

Superb dial! Bravo, Bill. [nt]

By: amanico : November 26th, 2016-18:04

Swiss only dial with OCC nice touch.

By: Bill : November 26th, 2016-18:42

Means have some nice genuine lume. And a hairy wrist shot. Rolex 6569 with cal 1030 movement occ dial ...

And it changes from what we are used to see and wear! Very class. [nt]

By: amanico : November 26th, 2016-23:50

I am a sport Rolex guy this watch we never get wrist time.

By: Bill : November 27th, 2016-08:02

Goes to the safe box with many such brothers. Bill

Vintage Rolex

By: chippytime : November 27th, 2016-01:32

Understated Rolex. The only Rolexes I like and this is a superb example. Congratulations Bill! A word of caution about the lumen. Do have it checked for radiation. I recently acquired a great 1958 vintage watch (not a Rolex) and have just checked it for g...

Thanks for your thoughts.

By: Bill : November 27th, 2016-08:00

I hear your concern on the lume but considering that there are tens of thousands or 100\'s of thousands of watches from all brands and zero stories other than the factory workers we know about and one attempt at law suit 50 years ago from a family in Ny t...

Radiation in time pieces

By: chippytime : November 27th, 2016-09:32

Dear Bill I understand your point of view, which I agree to a limited extent, provided one knows and understands the risks (like smoking) and does not wear an overly radiant watch at night and only during the day occasionally if necessary. One needs to id...