Mary Anny
4433
Good information, thanks.
In my 79190 from 1995, I remember the folded links and the absence of a notch on the bracelet clasp. The safety lock piece simply lied over the clasp while it used to have its own room into clasps from Rolex watches. That was the case for all the lady Submariners from Tudor too. What do you think?
Tudor submariner Bracelet from the catalog late 1970’s
Original catalog shots of Tudor 94110 and 94010 9315 with 380 End links perfect for Submariner Catalog calls for 9315 flip lock 9315 bracelet folded linkks Bracelet 9315 folded with flip lock for Rolex submariner also 1680, 5512 and 5513 ...
It gives a point of reference in time.
However with everything Rolex there are always possible configurations. These catalogs are very hard to come across as Rolex issued them to AD’s and accounted for them by serial number.
Not essential but possible.
I have had some but i need to check if in both the 9315 folded and 93150 solid they exist. But again this catalog is very late 1970’s almost 1980. So the older watches i think will have both rivet and folded options.
As far as the Rolex catalog they do not show Tudor buckles.
But from personal experience i have seen the Tudor buckle on the 9315 bracelet from 1971-1972 that was matched to the Monte Carlo watch.
Good information, thanks.
In my 79190 from 1995, I remember the folded links and the absence of a notch on the bracelet clasp. The safety lock piece simply lied over the clasp while it used to have its own room into clasps from Rolex watches. That was the case for all the lady Sub...
That is correct. 9315 no indent 93150 indent
Top Rolex 9315 buckle flat this the older version folded links Bottom Rolex 93150 buckle with indent on clasp solid links ...