amanico
[JLC Moderator]
401550
Like you, I prefer the 16520 to the 116520. I find, and we'll agree on that, that it is a a kind of best of both modern and vintage world.
And we'll also agree on our common preference for the 16520 over the Dayto 62xx... The Daytona fans will kill us for that, but hey, let's stay strong.
Now, 16520 or 16519?
I still have a preference for the 16520. I do hear you on the bracelet concern, which is very true. But the charm of the steel is something.
Which doesn't mean the 16519 doesn't have charm!
Best,
Nicolas
The argument for this ref. 16519 being the ultimate grail Daytona
Before I begin, I want to say that the following is my opinion and mine only. Please feel free to disagree, and I have no doubt that many of you will. First, I view all Daytona models before 1989 (ie. pre-16520) as more functional watches, neither aesthet...
Like you, I prefer the 16520 to the 116520. I find, and we'll agree on that, that it is a a kind of best of both modern and vintage world.
And we'll also agree on our common preference for the 16520 over the Dayto 62xx... The Daytona fans will kill us for that, but hey, let's stay strong. Now, 16520 or 16519? I still have a preference for the 16520. I do hear you on the bracelet concern, whi...
Without question....
.....it is a cool watch and you make a good case for a "grail" status. However, I think the thing about the word "grail" is that actually such a thing doesn't exist. We all have specific watches that feel like they are grails but then, once we attain the ...
You have to tie your shoes a lot!
Great post and in many ways I agree with you. The only thing that put me off to the gold Daytona references on straps were how excessively large the folding buckle is. Besides that I would love to own one!👍
Compelling articulation
Signo, You made compelling and detailed arguments for your choice. I didn't even know a non bracelet original model existed. That makes sense and looks good too. As an aside, the workers at Zenith Manufacture also remember those days well. When I visited ...
A WG Rolex/Zenith, a Credor & a Lexus..
..what's not to love. Great photos. Best, John.
The last of the good ones!
A clearly well thought out and articulated arguement. While I too am in the camp of the Zenith Daytona, I own a 16520, for me your case for 16519 falls down in one major area. The strap. To me, Subs, GMTs and Daytonas must be on a bracelet. The bracelet i...
Interesting point, the necessity of having a bracelet on GMT MASTER / DAYTONA and SUBMARINERS...
I would be less categoric on the Submariners, as the Nato works very well on them...
I've given this a lot of thought..........
but am afraid I can't add anything to it without a few more pictures.
Here you go.
A couple 16520 shots for you to compare and contrast with the 16519. ...
Not much. I'm afraid to...
damage / loosen the SEL. The 16519 gives me more peace of mind. ...
Nice one, but I think we need more pictures to decide :)
I do like the style of the Zenith era Daytonas more than the last 2 generations.... The Daytona has gone from more of a tool watch to more of a fashion watch (as has all of Rolex's line-up). Cheers, John
Love the detailed review
Thank for the detailed review and pictures. I have been looking at this watch to, but the 16519 was never with the black dial from the steel 16520. It must have replaced the original 16519 white dial with Arabic numerals?
I have to resurrect this thread . . .
Because I have read it several times and the comments are a factor in my decision to pick up the black dial version of the 16519. In my opinion, the 16519 looks very very good with the black strap. Truth be told, I am not much of a bracelet guy, so the Da...