TS1987
561
Not sure about anyone else
When I decided to buy my first Rolex, I got a 16600. U serial, lug holes, tritium. Pictured here with an older friend, a 16520 T serial. Still own both

Excellent review.....
By: Andy : April 1st, 2017-13:04
It seems to be a very interesting subject at the moment. Although I like the new one, especially the size, it just isn't enough to fit in the collection and the previous 4000 is too similar to my sub to fit in the collection..!! Yours, Andy.
Very nice article, Imran.
By: amanico : April 1st, 2017-23:42
I like the way you compare the 911 and the SD. Maybe you could also say that like the 911, the new SD is bigger. Did it loose its spirit? I don't know. Somehow, yes, with this cyclop. I am not thrilled by the last opus, but I have to see it in the real be...
Excellent comparison!
By: Anatol : April 2nd, 2017-01:22
Owning a 1665 DR and a 16600 as well as a '68 911S and a 964RS, I can fully relate to your analogy. To me, however, the 996 of Seadwellers was the 116600, for similar reasons like those given by Alex: the bracelet endlinks that do not match the case horns...