WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Rolex

Team effort

 

Lets try and come with a good analogy. Because your analogy is not good- for the following reasons.


1) The first Sub which you oftened have argued is the DNA of Rolex (the submariner being the core DNA of Rolex) was a small crown. 6204
2) The second sub was also a small crown - the 6205. I think first then came the big crowns 6200 etc.
3) The boxster analogy is too harsh. 
4) So big crown Tudors are more expensive than a nice 6536-1. I will see if that is really true. I am sceptical wink
5) I think the small crowns are not necessary the 911s - but neither are the big crowns. I actually think the 5512 and 5513 might be better 911 analogy
than the big crowns. I still view big crowns as a 2.4L RS version.

Lets try and find a better analogy. Best Edmond

  login to reply
💰1849 Marketplace Listings for Rolex