Rafiki3107
29
Whaouh!
Doug,
i agree this "triple 6" are such amazing watches that you don't care thats thicker than a "classic" Sub!
Congrats for this catch, it seems GORGEOUS...
I also felt in love some months ago with this "early Rolex saphyre" (and don't forget it's also the first Rolex with SEL!)..
Mine, is a Mark I, matt dial:
Devil inside...
I am not going to make you another review of this beastof depths, just a small return on the history of the Triple six. Triple Six forr 16660, the first saphir SD, the bad boy sub, not confortable... ... but really expressive in the wrist. It arrives at t...
Mummmmh...
...I don't see the box but yes, the case is nice ! lol Find her a nice matte dial and she will be perfect ;-)
Did you call me?
The Triple 6.... Not the most comfortable watch, foir sure, maybe not the most elegant, but do we really care? It is a lovely watch, a kind of " Bad Boy ", with a strong character, and a lot of charm. Aaah, between circield and pinted indexes, I'd go on p...
How can you say this watch isn't elegant?
It is the Muhammad Ali of watches. Its big. Its strong. It is full of character. And it floats like a butterfly. Well actually no, it doesn't float like a butterfly at all. Its a brute, but it is elegant in its brutishness. I love mine....
I like this kind of advertisement...
Wow, Steven, another beauty, here. You get them all or what? Best, Nicolas, impressed.
thanks my friend but...
I only own a fraction compared to your amazing collection Cheers and have a good weekend S.
You're too modest, Steve
If we speak about Rolex, you have a HELL of a collection! Best, my friend. Nicolas
Whaouh!
Doug, i agree this "triple 6" are such amazing watches that you don't care thats thicker than a "classic" Sub! Congrats for this catch, it seems GORGEOUS... I also felt in love some months ago with this "early Rolex saphyre" (and don't forget it's also th...