Lankysudanese
5212
Borrowed this absolute-beauty from a friend and fellow watch collector.
The finishing of the case, hands, and hour markers is unmatched in the haute horology world, IMHO. And that dial !!! ๐๐
Add the lightness of titanium and the 100M WR, and youโve got the perfect watch. Just not sure about the PR indicator on the dial though ๐ค. I could do without it.
What do you guys think?
Hussam
Borrowed this absolute-beauty from a friend and fellow watch collector.
The finishing of the case, hands, and hour markers is unmatched in the haute horology world, IMHO. And that dial !!! ๐๐ Add the lightness of titanium and the 100M WR, and youโve got the perfect watch. Just not sure about the PR indicator on the dial thoug...
I think it's Peak GS.
Excellent wristshot as well! Thanks for posting it here, cheers, Filip
๐๐ฟ.
I managed to drop the watch on concrete (strap failure) and the high-grade titanium took it like a champ: a small scratch thatโs only notable on close examination. Iโm now a GS fan
Hafta agree with you about the PR hand.
Looks like it scraped away at the snowflake. Otherwise awesome watch...nice friend !
Iโll take the opposite view and say that I like the overall design and placement of the PR indicator..
The same way I like the old GS with the Seiko logo on top. Iโd go out on a limb and say that you lose some of the GS soul if you put the PR at the back. In my uneducated opinion, itโs very Japanese where functionality is married with aesthetics in a pract...
All fair points, and I thank you for sharing them.
I believe itโs the spring version with the off-pink hue to the dial. I, myself, am probably gonna go for the winter version, just for the added ruggedness of the look
Beautiful!
PR indicator is fine IMHO Doesn't bother me at all but it might look better without? Or leave it the way it is? ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ ...