Whirling
276
Thank you so much!
This is very interesting information. It does, however, make me wonder all the more why some rather high-end brands use the lower grade movement, if they're not more robust, and the cost differences between the grades is fairly low compared to the total price of the watch.
I know some businesses, such as Wal-Mart, operate completely on their ability to shave tiny slivers off of costs so they can undercut their competitors. I would have thought, however, that brands selling watches for thousands of dollars would worry more about losing a few sales if people feel their movements aren't of the finest quality, at least in functional terms.
To answer my own question, I suppose the vast majority of people buying watches don't care so much about timekeeping. "Chronometer" is more of a marketing ploy than anything else for certain brands. We all have our smart phones, after all. However, now that we all have our smart phones, we can tell much more readily how much our watches are off.
I know a very educated guy with a great collection of first-rate watches, VC, ALS, etc. He's incredibly knowledgeable about watches and goes to watch events. He doesn't care about timekeeping precision at all when the watches are within a minute a day. He points out there is so much more to movements than that. The fact that inexpensive movements can keep great time is, for him, reason not to use it as a metric for quality. I can't say he is wrong. It's just a preference thing...
Regards,
Jon