jmpTT
858
Old and new, both are appealing...
Your review does brings to our attention the difference between mechanical watches, then and now. The original version was a finely crafted necessity, while the modern iteration is a luxury watch with practical elements. As collectors, we tend to get stuck on the incremental price increases, while the incremental improvements in build quality may go unnoticed, especially if they don't concern the movement. Looking at these two watches side-by-side, we can see the modern version has many more interesting details, right down to ridges on the pushers and the side profile of the crown.
Unlike some other Zeniths, the overall legibility is good and there are no silly scales on the hours subdial. That's not to say I don't have issues with that subdial, because I do. The hours subdial is generally much easier to guesstimate than the minutes subdial - having a legible minutes counter is essential to obtaining a precise elapsed time. Zenith seemed to understand this 40 years ago, but the current design obviously prioritizes aesthetics and balance the larger dial. This is the difference between then and now, but if I was on Zenith's design team, I would feel a bit uneasy about the enlarged hours counter. Ironically, seeing this problem again and again gives me an new appreciation for the Frederic Piguet 1185, where the running seconds subdial was located at 6 o'clock.
This message has been edited by jmpTT on 2014-07-20 08:05:43