I first have to repeat that, with some very few exceptions, I don't l ike Tourbillons on the dial side, when they make a " hole " in the dial.
I much prefer them being part of the dial, I mean without hole, or in the back side.
Here is a typical case of these few exceptions: You have a hole, ok, but what a delicate candy!
The sweet guilloché of the dial is just sublime, and even the non colored gold guy I am can appreciate and even like the blend of rose gold and platinum of the case.
A blend which enhances the preciousness of a Watch whose ( relatively ) small 36 mm case avoids to generate the feeling of a " in your face " Watch.
Not show off at all, just elegance!
Ok, one think I would have preferred is to be able to see more of this movement ( Cal 558 ) rather than this mainplate which hides all, on the back side, even if nicely engraved.
Here are the few pictures I could take:
If I got it well, this is a reference which was produced in the 90ies.
That is the Breguet I like!
Best,
Nicolas
This message has been edited by amanico on 2014-04-13 03:47:20
Difficlut to compare this Breguet and the JLC Master Tourbillon, this last one being automatic and modern.
The style and the finish are different, too. Although, the prices are similar, on the market.
The Gyro One is another league. And a totally different concept. This is my favourite, with some GP créations, and the Ulysse Nardin Royal ( or Imperial ) Blue.
Thanks, my friend.
Nicolas