Comments:
You're right, but it is quite hard to tell...
what is a gain and what is a loss without including subjective elements.
If we take for instance the 5140 vs 5327, in one you have the well-known pure thinness of Patek Philipe combined with a Perpetual C and on the other hand, you have the beautiful shape, a work of art to me, in a more masculine and modern way.
But still both very elegant and refind classic pieces.
About the 5140, this is totally my opinion too as this grey dial Pt version is maybe the best of the lineage!
Cheers, Mark
If we take for instance the 5140 vs 5327, in one you have the well-known pure thinness of Patek Philipe combined with a Perpetual C and on the other hand, you have the beautiful shape, a work of art to me, in a more masculine and modern way.
But still both very elegant and refind classic pieces.
About the 5140, this is totally my opinion too as this grey dial Pt version is maybe the best of the lineage!
Cheers, Mark
Thank you for your comments. Could you be able to answer the question..
What was the rationale for the new model number "5327".
I got 3940 changed to 5140. But 5327 ?? I am curious to know the algorithm, if any, PP uses. I always thought there was some rationale for numbering the models, but I am totally baffled now.
Thanks and cheers.
Jim
I think this is the question we've all been thinking about!
I don't really have the answer though the 5227 (after 5107 and 5127) and 5327 may show the 27 is for the new generation but this is never very clear and logical (at least to me).
Thanks for your nice comment I'm glad you enjoyed it.
Cheers, Mark
Thanks for your nice comment I'm glad you enjoyed it.
Cheers, Mark