Patek Philippe

Hi...

which of the two would you prefer?

Granted, there is a price difference but they are the two sport watches by PP....

Thanks.....

Cheers

as the so called "sports watches" of PP have been an error in the PP product line... IMHO

It is a clumsy effort to also provide sports watches - which are not "real Pateks" concerning the aesthetics

They are not my taste!  

I know that there are quite a few lovers of these product lines  - also here on this forum - so please do not feel offended!

I am afraid I simply do not understand why it is necessary to be a dress watch in order to be a "real" Patek. I personally do not live a daily life that is really compatible with a dress watch. Must I be foreclosed from Patek quality? No offense meant.

Glenn

No message body

I would have pulled the trigger long ago if the hands weren't so clumsy on the Aquanaut.

and low key with the rubber strap that I find it much nicer to wear although I love the 5712 in rose gold. In a perfect world PP would make the 5712 in SS on a rubber strap with a ceramic bezel. I would be first in line

the Aquanaut is very comfortable to wear....

Cheers

would you say that the hands are clumsy?

Cheers

The watch has an interesting case and dial design. The stick hands seem like an after thought. I hope that this is not offensive to anyone. As stated, I like this watch and would like to own one, once I get past my issues with the hands.

Cheers
Joe

Aquanaut is my vote, especially with the synthetic strap, very comfortable, comparison with my IWC XII below.





This message has been edited by captain-winters on 2010-01-09 20:27:50

for sharing your photos...

Cheers

You must wear it to feel the comfort...

and it is quite comfortable...

I think, though, that the Aquanaut is even more comfortable....

Cheers

There both are aliens in the PP collection...

There really so comfortable.. The steel strap are amazing, so comfortable..
and the caoutchouc is perfect for summer...

Very thin pieces compared to other diving watches (Sub, 50, ....).

So many people disagree their designs.

For the actual version, I can't fail to notice the difference of price...
The two simple models have the same mouvement (324), and one is 20k and the other 10K....

So I would prefer a simple Aquanaut and a complicated Nautilus with 240 (like the 5712)

IMHO

With what I perceive as a nice patina...

A trick of Light, or reality?

Yours?

Best,

Nicolas

Thank you..

No, that's a true picture...

but shot with the 'tony box'...

So a big halogen, in a white paper box...

I'm sad I do not have any macro....

PS : Canon 5d with 24-70 2.8 L.... So quite good camera...

By the way, i love your 5712..

It's in my wishlist... (which is quite long..)

BR

Nicolas

But, the outcome may be a bit ...Let's say...Expensive.



Best

Nicolas

tempting but expensive....

Cheers This message has been edited by PinkPanther on 2010-01-10 12:07:43

Love this watch and very comfortable This message has been edited by buscemi4 on 2010-01-10 04:09:19

And I agree with your thoughts....

Cheers

I love a lot its weird look, typical of the 70ies:



But, as with the Aquanaut, I don't see myself practicing any sport with.

I would be too afraid with the Micro rotor and the scratch catching bezel.

In both cases, lovely watches!

Best,

Nicolas

is it yours?

Cheers

It is a question of principle...

Best,

Nicolas

This message has been edited by amanico on 2010-01-10 13:41:55

you are the one that surprises me....

Gorgeous watch....

Cheers

No message body

Best my friend,

--

Richard.

To me, they are not at all sports watches  though.

No message body