Greetings to all,
I have a VC whose history I seek. I went to the VC forum... and unfortunately, I was black-balled from their site. I'd like to post my VC pics, but am finding it difficult. When I use the "insert image" button: my PC gets a pop-up, which I'm not keen to allow.
The case back's No. is 3003xx and it has a V453 mvmt. The most similar watch I've viewed is a pic from the 2007 Vintage Prices Coording German Catalogue. My VC is similar to the 1945 pictured; however, the face differs. Focus Numerals are Roman, i.e., XII, III and IX w/ ! indicators for the intervening hour marks.
I've been told it's essence is presented in the VC Patrimony Contemporaine - manual wind offering: which is the modern reintrepretation of the typical design of VC's from the '50s. I personally, did not see the likeness and so informed the forum moderator in an apparent offending manner - thus becomming persona non-grata.
A more germaine question is when did VC start putting their TM Cross on their watch faces?
In viewing the inside underside of the back case cover, I noticed several etchings; apparantly from craftsmen that serviced the watch. Does or did watchmakers subscribe to a protocol when performing such service; e.g., date/watch condition etc.?
Thanks, in advance, for any information you might provide.
Sincerely........... bandit
Thank you, Bill:
Where does one find the RN?: on the movement itself? Is calibre the same as movement stamping (in my case V453)? Yet to read Landes' or Gould's pubs.
I'm feeling the dolt. I've tried to copy pics from Vista photo galleries of my VC; but my PC doesn't want to do it. Your "Image Insert" button does not insert the images.... how does one convert a jpeg to a URL address acceptable to your protocol? I'm a dumb-ass here, so I'll attempt to send my VC pics via e-mail to you.
OBTW, is there/was there a protocol among craftsmen Watchmakers (WM) regarding their etchings on the inside of case backs when they serviced the piece? Is there a registry of WMs; perhaps in an international WMs Guild?
Thanks to all for you consideration.
bandit
Dear Bill and all Members:
I hope my pic posts of my VC have reached you. I appologise for the poor quality.
Assuming that a Caliber V434 is a 1938 VC... and a Caliber V454 is a 1943 VC; would it be logical to assume that my VC's Caliber 453 was crafted and produced between 1938 - 1943? There seems to be a collolation between two corolaries, i.e., Date and Caliber. Perhaps my VC is a Vintage piece (whatever that means... maybe a franken or just a Knock-off!).
I intend to follow the underside case back etchings' history. I'm surprised that so many of the "pristine" vintage VC pieces presented do not possess such hallmarks.
My VC is not pristine... I allowed a "servicer" to loose the winding stem and replace it w/ an Omega one. Is it now franken (certainately, not "born-on" - like I like my beer!)? ... less than that a bastard? ... if VC replaces it with a new/replacement stem... what then?; perhaps refurbished?
No matter... I'll leave it to the next generation to determine my VC's value.
Thanks in advance for the consideration.
bandit
This message has been edited by WHL on 2008-05-03 18:56:34Hi
i realised that i do have a exact same watch as the one shown in the picture. Its from 1940s and manual winding. Funny thing is that when i wind it, it feels like a pocket watch movement. ( can feel the tension and "loud" clicking sound). Is it the same for yours?
so how valuable or rare is such watch?
rgds
KK