Geo, your comments are well taken.
By: ThomasM : December 18th, 2006-01:56
As we become "more professional" I am sure there will be more consistency across the new site - type fonts, picture "styles," page formats, use of colors, etc.
I am very familiar with the concepts underlying "CIS" - corporate identity systems.
Having been an enthusiasts driven, hobbyist site, I deliberately kept the "garage tinkered, hodge podge" look and feel. Certainly that is no excuse for bad taste or lousy design.
On the other hand, I don't think anyone can argue with the easy, intuitive interface; fast loading; and easy to understand hierarchical indented indexing of posts and threads.
That said, there is a wide range between bad taste or lousy design and being so artsy fartsy that style overcomes any substance; hopefully our site so far falls into somewhere in the middle.
Again, not that the following information PRECLUDED using a more consistent cropping dimension or shape, or more "stylish" layout of the pieces, but please note that ALL the pieces in the shot are privately owned - not "models, demos, and loaners" - by PuristS' within the community.
So, I guess, without disagreeing with your points, I only ask you to look at the pictures as "hey, come look at my photo album of my family" rather than "these are supposed to be professionally styled, groomed, contrived but Oh, so perfect" glamour shots.
Cheers,
TM