Solid, very conserative, retro styled in a 60's Tokyo kind of way. Impecably finished. A simple yet highly evolved manufacture movement which is highly accurate and super stable in all positions. It appealed to me as a perfect office watch also. I think Seiko offer a no non-sense, value for money proposition across their entire range, Grand Seikos included.


1. Creates a network of authorized dealers (including one east of the Mississippi River....is that too much to ask?)
2. Further clarifies how one is to get his/her GS serviced without having to send it all the way back to Japan and waiting for God-knows-how-long (compare that to getting a Rolex serviced....)
3. Does more than just sprinkle a few samples among its 3 current AD's (I can get virtually any model other top brands from many ADs within 50-100 miles of my house... I don't need to mail-order from 3,000 miles away....).
4. Clarifies what it's intentions are regarding their entire line, including, e.g., Credor
....then and only then will I consider purchasing a Grand Seiko. Until then, there are too many other great watches around for me to be bothered.
While Seiko is the brands that makes 300K to 400K watches a year (most of which are quartz), the worthy watches for watch nuts like us is relatively small quantity, and resources in that department is quite limited, with top watchmakers having been awarded medals by the Japanese Government. So, you have to wait patiently until the capability grows to cover the global market to provide similar level of services, and I think it won't come quick. But my experiences says that the servicing time is quite reasonable. Stay tuned. But from my perspective, complicated watches of major brands tend to have to be sent back to Switzerland anyway and takes several months to come back and, to me, it would be the same thing.
Like I stated, Seiko makes perhaps 300 or 400K watches annually and most of them are relatively cheap quartz. So, I meant to say that the most of those USD20 or USD100 watches are not worthy to discuss here among watch nuts like us.
More to your point - I honestly don't get what you don't get. GS are mostly SS, very accurate, service is superb as the top of the line of Seiko. GS concept is the highest quality as the practical watches - I repeat, practical watches. So, no or little bell and whistles (of course there are some, some chronograph and such). The price is reasonable (I don't know the pricing for EUR or US, but GS price ranges from 3K to 7K, about) and it serves the purpose - being practical. For that, I agree that it is superb. Credor is different under different concept, by the way. Credor also is the top of the line, but more on the luxury side with Urushi dial, Noritake dial, etc., for example. It really comes down to one's expectation from the watches. As you know, my watches are not only Seikos, but variety of watches and I like and respect Seiko, GS or Credor, as much as I do ALS, Moser, Patek, etc.

Hi Olivier,
Here is why I think GS is exceptional as an owner of several as well as having seen both factories.
1. Case work is excellent, especially on the cases with contrasting polished/brushed finishes; the edges are sharp and carefully done. The models you shown are entirely polished. Seiko also has an in-house titanium alloy that can be polished to a shine which is unusual.
2. The dial and hands are exceptional. The hands and indices are diamond cut, hence the super sharp edges and bevels. The dials are printed with Seiko's in-house printing equipment, resulting in thick and sharp lettering. The dial and hands are probably the greatest visible quality of GS in my opinion.
3. The movement finishing of functional parts, especially in the escapement and balance, is truly extraordinary. The teeth of the pinions are polished, for instance, which is Geneva Seal standard. The decorative finishing on the other hand is mechanically applied.
4. Also the quiet innovation in the watch. For example the SPRON alloys for the hairspring and main spring. The new mainspring allows for 72 hour power reserve (against 50 something before) with the same barrel, and the new hairspring is less sensitive to temperature and magnetism. Also, the inhouse pallet and escape wheel that are made using etching technology like that to etch silicon. These have perforations cut in them for lightness and special profile of the teeth on the escape wheel for retention of lubrication.
GS quality is exceptional, especially for this price range. There are no watches in this price range that are comparable, especially for dial and hand work, and movement finishing.
- SJX
This message has been edited by SJX on 2010-12-09 19:38:02Hi Oliver,
Which aspect of the crown disappoints you? The relief GS logo or the knurls on the crown?
- SJX
I have also recently been trying to get as much information on this Seiko range, as the GS has really got me interested in getting another Seiko.
But with only one authorised dealer in the UK, getting to see one is not going to be that easy.
Thanks for posing the questions, Oliver
it's just plain. Perhaps the knurls could be sharper, but otherwise I think it's on par with the competition, unlike the dial, hands, movement etc which are exceptional. It is perhaps the nature of GS that the crown is an issue; if it were an Omega it would be ho-hum and par for the course.
- SJX

I think GS is superior to both BP and JLC in terms of dials and hands, as well as case work. Decorative movement finish JLC and BP win out, and I'd assume functional finish is similar.
- SJX
In terms of hands - GS hands are thick, polished with sharp edges thanks to diamond cutting; BP and JLC hands are flatter with less depth
Dials - GS dial printing is thick and very sharp under magnification compared to the other two, however, BP and JLC have more elaborate dial finishes, e.g. guilloche, while GS is mostly brushed silver
Cases - BP and JLC cases are largely stamped and polished, with no contrasting case finishes or complex shapes
- SJX