As it depends on the brand.
For example, to service a minute repeater will cost less than a time only, depending on the brands...
But, in general terms, expect to pay some big bucks...
And yes, you're absolutely right to raise this point: It is one thing to buy a complicated watch, it is another thing to service ( or repair ) it.
We should ALWAYUS ask how much we will be charged for a service. But we never think about that, while we often ask when it comes to a car.
To me, it is part of the decision when I consider a watch.
Best,
Nicolas
IMO after-sales service including servicing costs can make or break a brand for me. For instance, two well know brands can differ so drastically when it comes to customer service. One will give you the run around and will not accept or find it hard to admit that there was a slip up during manufacturing, even though it was plainly obvious. Follow up was also less than satisfactory. The other simply excels and always exceeds expectations on service or any follow up action if a problem arises. I will continue to patronize the latter, having full confidence that any issues will be well taken care of.
cheers
fernando
I must admit that I have had the same impression as you: that the service cost of a watch is somehow linked to the cost of the new watch. As if the brand based their service pricing policy on the consideration "if the customer was willing to pay xxx for the watch, he/she must surely be willing to pay x% of that cost to keep it in good condition"
I just find it difficult to accept. Just consider complicated watches that come in different case materials. Why would it be more expensive to service the Pt model compared to the SS (except minor things like differences in case polish)?
Thanks for bringing this issue up - it is very relevant (also for me personally). I believe that it will always be an uncomfortable situation to be fully dependent on a prorietary supply such as these services (you can't really shop around for this service, right). I guess dialogue with the brand after sales department can remove some of that discomfort - but it will not necessarily change the price though.
All the best
Nikolaj
I have always rejected the idea that 'if you have to ask you can't afford it'.
This in my opinion only applies to idiotic billionaires, most billionaires don't get wealthy by ignoring costs and the rest of us surely take this into consideration when making a purchase.
I aspire to own a grand complication and it's not inconceivable that I will be in a position to do so in a few years time. Servicing costs are therefore a real issue especially if I wish to service every three to four years.
It reminds me of the Ferrari Mondial which can be had for much cheapness second hand but which legendarily requires the entire engine to be removed for an oil change! Servicing costs are therefore astronomical offsetting the initial bargain.
Nice to know some ranges...
The cost for that "wacky indie" QP is SCARY!!! Now I'm a bit worried about my "avantgarde indie" QP!
Thanks for clarifying Gary! I would say spending the money to bring it up-to-date is worth the cost. Good to know going forward it won't be such a sting for every regular service.
In general, it is much much higher than servicing cost for luxury cars manufactured in Europe.
Depending on the extent of service, it could range between 5% - 8% of the cost of the watch.
Imagine you have 10 complicated watches due for service. You probably need to sell one to fund the service of the remaining 9 watches.
As regards indie, it is worse.
Regards
Ling