answer is. For me, I would take the RM010 in white gold - prefer some heft and the finish to the precious metal. However, an RM010 in titanium would still be a great watch. Always preferred the RM010 over the 005 - the movement has been improved over time and the slightly increased size of the case is preferable. Just my two cents and certainly not what others may prefer.
Andrew H
in WG to be more accurate.
i own a RG which is sublime but does attract atention more thats why i'm exchanging it with a WG which to me is moe discreet
either way please post pics after you pull the trigger
Ti or WG are great choices, and if I had to choose, I'd choose the WG for the RM010 for the added heft.
Cheers,
Anthony
The RM10 is a very large watch. I personally find the RM5 a better size and fit.
I selected WG over Ti because: (1) I think the watch deserves a precious metal; and (2) WG is much easier to maintain.
Craig
after it was mounted on the rubber strap. Perfect size and fit for me. Don't forget it's the only RM, which is 100m water resistant, with exception of new diver.
Thanks, Adi.
Hello,
is the rubber strap for the RM005 now already available? or is it a self-made construction (have you pictures of it?) - I yearned so long for a rubber strap for my RM005 RG...
Best Regards
Bernd
so I use RM10 rubber strap. It fits very well, and I love it. Have not had any problems with this strap in the last 8 months. I posted pictures earlier, around november 2008, with f/u detailed discusion by other more experienced members. Check it out. I highly recommend this combo, unless you are willing to be at the mercy of RM and wait for RM005 rubber indefinetely. To tell you the truth, if it was not for this strap, I would of unloaded the watch by now. Tremendous difference to me.
Thanks, Adi.
Thank you for your fast and honest answer - do you really would put the RM away, if there would be no rubber strap?
Ciao
Bernd