its difficult to make a watch with "a hole on the dial"that appeal to me ,but somehow it works her.
The idea of slimness and elegance is delivered.
Thank you Nico for the report but the article should have been much better without the picture of Pt n1(skeleton),that watch is so ugly.
Mo

thats what happens when a watch is so ugly.
Mo
sit on that river bed and wait...it wll pass one day.......be ready....
Mo


))I think it's good that JLC go down in size! Not everybody likes lugs that goes outside your wrist...
As for the MUT Tourbillon - a stunning piece!
But as after reading several opinion about "hole" in the dial...
I have to agree.
Personally I love the PL no. 2!
A Horological dream...
Thank you for the share, my friend
Best
Blomman
And I have to say that this is not my favourite configuration...
I much prefer the Tourbillon in the case back, or when the Tourbillon is part of rthe dial ( Reverso Pt Nr 2 / GP Tourbillon 3 GBs / Gyro I, II, and Sphero ).
Best, and thanks for your input, Blomman.
Nicolas

Thanks for the review, Amanico.
You did not mention any data or figures about this watch's accuracy.
The Tourbillion Date 39 has the cal 978 which won the comp.
Is the new movement, 982, any better ?
Do you have any data from JLC on this issue?
I am trying to decide between the two.
Thanks
Tri
There is, at the exception of the date, no difference between the Cal 978 and the Cal 982. It is not better, nor worse.
You will only have to choose between the date or the no date tourbillon, it is just a matter of taste, your taste.
All the best, and bravo for your future choice!
Nicolas