
had a individual engraving like A - 1550, B - 1033 ... or something like this.
Service caseback don´t existe, because the 5402 has a monocoque case, so that it is only possible to change the whole case.
For me the case, that you show on the picture is original, but polished - look at the deepness of the "Royal Oak" on the pictures and compare them.

Perhabs there was once a individual engraving from the owner, that has been removed - and the inividual number with ist? Who knows.
The 99xxx you wrote about, is the number the official AP casebacknumber (you find this on official letters, certificates from AP to your watch and you find it in parts - not complete- inside the watch engraved on case) begins with for one special watch (in your case the number for the watch you show us, if the number is correct for this watch).
AP has used different "logical systems" for the 5402 during the series A, B, C and D and sometimes it is possible to find out the individual caseback-number, that is engraved on the caseback with help of this number (67XXX, 80XXX, 99XXX, B28XXX, B29XXX) - but it is not possible for all watches - i am sure not for D-series. For A-series it is easy.
99XXX i have not enough information - but it could be a B - XXX - but i am really not sure.
regards
Stephan
i answered a little bit untrue (only a little bit), because
also for D it is possible - but not only by comparing the "official caseback-number" for a D-series with another number from
D-series, from wich you know both numbers. Than you can find out by mathematics.
complicaded ?
Yes really
But don´t worry - the 5402 you show us is no D-Series, if number 99XXX is correct.
Stephan
if all other aspects of the watch are correct, you also can by a watch like this.
But the price must be really low according to a 5402 with correct case-back
and if you want to sell this watch one day, all potential byers (and real collectors
don´t are potential byers than) will have the same major doubts.
Stephan
this post reminded me of Dr. T's posts:
and this one:
Is it also possible that the reliable sources and old timers (as in old AP employees) that for many years said that the 5402 was 1st released without any leading Alpha character were indeed correct and this caseback is the 1st proof that we've seen of that?
S