Hmm. That´s correct i think; given GP does about 3 percent quartz movements today, it´s really more a "commemorative production"

Something easily overseen is the fact these quartz movements are pretty special.
Not just the way they are finished, which is certainly on par with the mechanical movements.
But the functional part does have some surprises, in that it´s genuine GP through and through. It´s running on GP-patented stepping motors, which is a direct successor of the 1960´s development which then was a world´s first for GP.
The GP quartz movements include a mechanical geartrain, which is exactly like a mechanical watch up to the jewels.
Naturally it is much smaller and a LOT more difficult due to the low energy supply; friction is a real topic, because the power supply in quartz movements is very demanding (to make it work a long time) and only a fraction of the power supplied by the mainspring in a mechanical watch.
One might compare the size with the "Lange 31", which measures 37.3mm in diameter and will do for one month (a real achievement). The quartz movements are smaller than 25mm and will do about 2-3 years with a battery. So this may put things in relation and on such small scales, power supply and friction become critical issue. Which means everything needs to be designed, crafted, finished and assembled very very carefully to make it work.
The other interesting aspect, at least to me, is these units offering GP-propietory mechanical complications.
That´s unusual too, because it would be likewise easy to attach an electric motor to each hand.
But for these movements, the cadrature that runs the indication is exactly the same as in mechanical movements; that´s very tricky, because the power to supply these is little and thus it´s challenging to do them.
Apart from the fact the quartz movements are pretty small, so it´s really a very limited space which makes things even more difficult.
Simply put, doing the same complication for a mechanical movement is a lot more easy, simply because there´s more power to work with and thus a mechanical movement will be not as demanding when it comes to design and executional details.
Well, as per the "better" part, it really depends on the perspective.
Obviously all this can be exciting

Now GP´s quartz movements today are found in ladies models only; among the female watch lovers, it is not uncommon to encounter a more "pragmatic" approach which is the battery thingy to be very practical first of all

And that it is; notwithstanding all admiration for craftmanship and skills, not caring about the watch to be wound is pretty much of a practical benefit.
The major downside, which most GP quartz movements do share with some mechanical brethren like the GP30C0 column-wheel chronograph, is the most interesting part to be hidden under the dial. So it´s quite stealthy and may require someone interested in the details.
Cheers,
Peter